Does this tool certify EU AI Act compliance?

No. It maps selected facts to likely Article 50 paths and evidence gaps. It does not inspect a deployment, provide legal advice or issue certification.

Does the C2PA JSON become a Content Credential?

No. The JSON is only an authoring view aligned to fields in the C2PA 2.4 AI Disclosure assertion. It is not CBOR serialized, signed, bound to an asset or independently verifiable.

Are questionnaire answers uploaded?

No. Assessment and exports run in the browser. Metrics use fixed event identifiers and do not include answers, names or model identifiers.

FREE / LOCAL / ARTICLE 50 + C2PA 2.4

Know what your AI must disclose before 2 August.

Turn a real deployment scenario into likely transparency paths, usable disclosure copy and an evidence queue. No questionnaire upload and no invented compliance score.

MAP MY DISCLOSURES READ THE RULE MAP

Decision aid only. Not legal advice, implementation verification or compliance certification.

50(1-5)SIX DECISION PATHS

EN / ES / ZHBROWSER LANGUAGE

C2PA 2.4UNSIGNED AUTHORING VIEW

LOCALASSESSMENT AND EXPORT

SCOPE / TRIGGERS / EVIDENCE

Describe the deployment, not the marketing claim.

Unknown is a valid answer. The checker keeps uncertainty visible instead of silently treating it as compliant or exempt.

WHO / WHERE

Scope signals

SYSTEM OR PRODUCT NAME OPTIONAL / LOCAL YOUR ROLE USED OR EXPOSED IN THE EU DEPLOYER USE IS PROFESSIONAL PLACED ON THE MARKET BEFORE 02 AUG 2026

WHAT PEOPLE EXPERIENCE

Article 50 triggers

DIRECT TWO-WAY AI INTERACTION AI INTERACTION IS OBVIOUS GENERATES OR MANIPULATES CONTENT OUTPUT CAN REACH PEOPLE ONLY STANDARD ASSISTIVE EDITING EMOTION OR BIOMETRIC CATEGORISATION REALISTIC DEEPFAKE SCENARIO PUBLIC-INTEREST TEXT PUBLICATION SUBSTANTIVE HUMAN REVIEW EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITY

SYNTHETIC CONTENT TYPES TEXT IMAGE AUDIO VIDEO

WHAT EXISTS TODAY

Implementation evidence

VISIBLE OR AUDIBLE DISCLOSURE MACHINE-READABLE MARK INDEPENDENT DETECTION TEST ACCESSIBILITY CHECK DECISION AND REVIEW RECORDS PRE-MARKET DATE RECORD AVAILABLE

C2PA 2.4 AUTHORING FIELDSOPTIONAL / DOES NOT SIGN A CREDENTIAL

C2PA MODEL TYPE HUMAN OVERSIGHT LEVEL MODEL NAME OPTIONAL MODEL IDENTIFIER OPTIONAL ARXIV SCIENTIFIC DOMAIN OPTIONAL

LOCAL CONTRACT: ANSWERS, NAMES AND MODEL IDENTIFIERS STAY IN THIS TAB. LOCAL EXPORTS INCLUDE THE IDENTIFIERS YOU ENTER.

DECISION AID / NO SCORE

Implementation map

WAITING FOR SCENARIO

50(1-5)

Run the checker to see likely triggers, review points, visible labels and missing implementation evidence.

0LIKELY TRIGGERED

0REVIEW REQUIRED

0MISSING EVIDENCE

HM::RECEIPT_V1

READY FOR CHECKSUM

Create a link and PNG from conclusions only. Raw answers and entered identifiers are excluded.

Obligation paths

Visible disclosure copy

Evidence queue

C2PA 2.4 / c2pa.ai-disclosureUNSIGNED AUTHORING VIEW

OFFICIAL SOURCES / EXPLICIT LIMITS

A map for implementation work, not a legal verdict.

The rules are derived from the Commission guidance published 20 July 2026 and Article 50. C2PA output follows the 2.4 field shape but remains unsigned and unbound.

Scope before score

The tool preserves unknown facts and possible exceptions as review items. It never converts them into a compliance percentage.

Visible is not machine-readable

A deepfake disclosure cannot rely only on embedded metadata. A visible label also does not create a robust machine mark.

Draft is not credential

The JSON authoring view is not CBOR, a manifest, a signature, an asset binding, crJSON or independent verification.